ArticlePloS one2026
Design of Urban resilience model in emergency situations.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In response to the current demand for urban resilience in emergency situations, we have developed an urban resilience assessment system for responding to sudden natural disasters based on housing data, infrastructure data, as well as Gross Domestic Product(GDP) and population data from 25 regions in Changchun and Hohhot. Subsequently, we conducted multidimensional consideration and analysis of the infrastructure service levels of the two cities, and based on this, designed aurora resilience in emergency situations. We have introduced three evaluation indicators: emergency response speed, resource allocation efficiency, and per capita facility density. We use Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) to analyze importance weights and obtain robustness of comprehensive infrastructure. Based on this, we used TOPSIS method to analyze the problems faced by two cities at different service levels and provided long-term and short-term investment strategies. Finally, we discussed the advantages and disadvantages of current urban resilience assessment models and conducted consistency and sensitivity analysis on the AHP algorithm. We found that existing models can to some extent reflect the stability and resilience of cities.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.