ReviewInternational archives of allergy and immunology2026
Lanadelumab in Hereditary Angioedema: Extending Dose Intervals from Every 2 Weeks to Every 4 Weeks.
Review in International archives of allergy and immunology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issuedErratum.2026
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundBoth clinical trial and real-world data demonstrate the effectiveness of lanadelumab long-term prophylaxis (LTP) to prevent hereditary angioedema (HAE) attacks, which may be maintained after dose interval extension from every 2 weeks (Q2W) to every 4 weeks (Q4W) in patients with well-controlled disease (attack free for >6 months). SUMMARY: This narrative review summarizes published data on lanadelumab treatment patterns collected from clinical trials and observational studies since US approval in 2018. Disease activity and HAE-related healthcare resource use at baseline and during the first 6 months of lanadelumab treatment may be useful indicators of patients with well-controlled disease who will be eligible for, and may derive benefit from, dose interval extension on lanadelumab. Patients who receive a dose interval extension could benefit from a reduction in treatment burden, but not all patients may be a good fit for interval extension. KEY MESSAGES: Although there are inherent limitations related to analyzing small sample sizes for subgroups of patients with a rare disease and for data derived from real-world studies, these data can inform physicians and patients about the characteristics and outcomes of patients who have successfully extended dosing intervals of lanadelumab LTP. This may in turn encourage regular monitoring to facilitate optimization of treatment and outcomes for each patient.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.