ArticleAnnals of medicine2026
Factors associated with clinical leadership among cardiovascular nurses in China: a multicentre cross-sectional study.
Article in Annals of medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesThis study aimed to investigate the current level of clinical leadership among cardiovascular nurses and identify its associated factors.
methodsA multicentre cross-sectional study was conducted among 411 cardiovascular nurses from three tertiary hospitals in China between January and June 2025. Data were collected using the Clinical Leadership Scale, Nursing Work Environment Scale and General Self-Efficacy Scale. Descriptive statistics, univariate analysis, Pearson correlation and multiple linear regression were used for data analysis.
resultsThe mean total score of clinical leadership was 63.53 ± 9.81 (mean item score 4.24 ± 0.82), indicating an above-average level. Higher scores were found in motivating others and role modelling, whereas challenging the status quo was the lowest-performing dimension. Professional title, working department, clinical leadership training, nursing work environment and general self-efficacy were independent positive influencing factors (all
conclusionsClinical leadership among cardiovascular nurses is relatively high and is affected by both organisational and individual psychological factors. Targeted leadership training, improved nursing work environment and enhanced self-efficacy can effectively strengthen clinical leadership in cardiovascular nursing practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.