ArticleThe Journal of general virology2026
Environmental samples, a sensitive and practical alternative to individual bird sampling in the surveillance of H9N2 vaccinated turkey flocks.
Article in The Journal of general virology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Surveillance for influenza A virus infections in vaccinated poultry flocks remains challenging due to animal welfare, logistical and financial constraints, particularly under current EU regulations governing high pathogenicity avian influenza (HPAI) vaccination. In this field study, we evaluated two environmental sampling (ES) methods - bedding boot swabs and drinker wipes - as alternatives to legally mandated individual bird testing, which involved monthly swabbing of 60 healthy birds (active surveillance, AS) and weekly swabbing of dead or sick birds (passive surveillance, PS). A total of 56 turkey flocks from 23 holdings in Lower Saxony, Germany, were monitored throughout the fattening period following single H9N2 vaccination at hatch. Semiquantitative reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR) revealed that, despite vaccination, H9N2 virus incursions occurred at least once in 76.8% (43/56) of flocks during the subsequent fattening period. Influenza A virus detection rate on the basis of individual samples was significantly higher by ES (24.1%) than through AS (10.65%;
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.