ArticleUpdates in surgery2026
Global trends in robotic-assisted laparoscopic surgery (RALS): a bibliometric analysis (2000-2024).
Article in Updates in surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The growing use of robotic systems in minimally invasive surgery has enhanced precision, reduced pain, and sped up recovery. This study aims to: (1) analyze publication trends in RALS; (2) identify leading countries, institutions, and authors; (3) highlight research hotspots and influential literature; (4) explain current trends; and (5) explore future directions to guide researchers. A bibliometric analysis was conducted using publication data from January 2000 to September 2024, analyzing metrics such as publications, citations, and collaborations. Key institutions, authors, and articles in RALS research were identified, along with trends in international collaborations. Data from the Web of Science was used, with modularity Q and silhouette S metrics to assess network structures. The analysis of global RALS research from 2000 to 2024 revealed substantial growth, with annual publications rising from fewer than 10 in the early 2000s to over 300 by 2022. The U.S. led in output and collaboration, with key institutions like Johns Hopkins and Mayo Clinic, and authors such as Scambia G and Yang GZ being highly cited. Keyword analysis identified themes like "robotic surgery" and "laparoscopy," with a growing focus on advanced robotic techniques. Despite overall growth, a slight decline in publications and citations in 2023 suggests a shift toward emerging technologies. The bibliometric analysis of RALS from 2000 to 2024 showed significant growth but highlighted challenges in global access. It emphasized the need for international collaboration and AI integration while calling for further research on cost-effectiveness, outcomes, and training for equitable global access.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42262714What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.