ReviewBiological trace element research2026
Reflections of a Scientist About Contributions to Knowledge Assessing the Nutritional Importance of 15 Trace Elements.
Review in Biological trace element research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Research findings are presented on the nutritional importance of aluminum, arsenic, boron, chromium, copper, iron, lead, magnesium, manganese, nickel, selenium, silicon, tin, vanadium, and zinc. This include findings from animal studies revealing beneficial effects of nutritional or ultra trace amounts of dietary arsenic, nickel, and silicon; showing the importance of zinc for bone health; initiating the study of boron as a possible essential nutrient; the likelihood that chromium and vanadium are beneficial in only pharmacological or supra nutritional amounts, and refuting the claims of essentiality for aluminum, lead and tin. Also, findings from human depletion/repletion experiments are presented showing the induction of boron deprivation signs that are alleviated by nutritional amounts of boron; providing evidence that a low boron status is prevalent in individuals consuming a Western diet; indicating a possible mechanism for the beneficial effects of boron; showing that zinc deficiency increases the need for copper; confirming that high dietary zinc exacerbates signs of copper deficiency; showing magnesium is prevalent in older individuals consuming a Western diet; presenting balance data to give an evidence based reason for updating the magnesium dietary reference intakes; evaluating various methods for magnesium status assessment; providing evidence that magnesium deficiency contributes to the risk of cardiovascular disease; and providing impetus for magnesium being declared an element of nutritional concern.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42262707What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.