ArticleAnnals of biomedical engineering2026
Comparative Analysis of Leaflet Materials, Stent Materials, and Stent Cell Density for Bileaflet Transcatheter Mitral Valve Design.
Article in Annals of biomedical engineering, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe biomechanical performance of bileaflet transcatheter mitral valves (TMVs) depends on complex interactions between leaflet material behavior and stent design. However, the contributions of leaflet materials and constitutive models, stent materials, and stent geometry to valve function and durability remain poorly understood.
methodsA parametric finite element study was conducted using a CAD model of a bileaflet TMV subjected to physiological pressure loading. Five leaflet material models were evaluated: 3 glutaraldehyde-fixed tissues-bovine pericardium (BP; FBP1, FBP2) and porcine pericardium (PP; FPP)-and 2 unfixed tissues-bovine (UBP) and porcine pericardium (UPP). BP was modeled as a linear elastic (FBP1) and Ogden (FBP2). Each was paired with 2 stent materials, cobalt chromium (CoCr) and nitinol, and 3 stent cell densities (low, medium, high), yielding 30 configurations. Von Mises stresses and relative leaflet opening were quantified.
resultsUPP achieved the largest opening (30-32%) with the lowest leaflet 99th percentile stresses (0.048-0.050 MPa), while FBP1 produced the smallest opening (8-9%) and highest leaflet stresses (0.077-0.078 MPa). Leaflet 99th percentile stress was strongly inversely correlated with valve opening (Spearman r=-0.9, p<0.01). Stent material had a negligible effect on valve opening but affected stent stress notably, with nitinol exhibiting about 2-3 orders of magnitude lower stresses compared to CoCr. Increasing stent cell density improved stress distribution with only a modest reduction in opening.
conclusionLeaflet material model was the primary determinant of bileaflet TMV biomechanical performance, whereas stent material and cell density exerted secondary but meaningful effects. These findings offer insights that may guide the design of more optimized TMV replacement devices.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42262702What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.