Observational studyInternational journal of clinical oncology2026
Volume-adjusted p2PSA-derived indices for predicting prostate cancer: the PROPHET study.
Observational study in International journal of clinical oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
17 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThis study aimed to assess the diagnostic value of prostate and transition zone (TZ) volume-adjusted p2PSA-derived indices for detecting any and clinically significant prostate cancer (PCa) in the prospective multicenter PROPHET study.
methodsAmong 363 men (median age 68 years, PSA 5.96 ng/mL), total PSA, free PSA, and p2PSA were measured to calculate %p2PSA, p2PSA/%fPSA, and the Prostate Health Index (PHI). Each index was adjusted by prostate or TZ volume. Diagnostic accuracy for any PCa and clinically significant PCa (csPCa) was evaluated using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), partial AUC (> 90% sensitivity), specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and false-positive rate.
resultsPCa was detected in 179 men (49.3%). For predicting any PCa, PHI density and TZ volume-adjusted PHI showed AUCs of 0.797 and 0.788 with false-positive rates of 50.5%. For csPCa defined as > 2 positive cores or Gleason Grade Group ≥ 2-3, AUCs were 0.807-0.823 and false-positive rates 42.0-47.5%. Both indices enabled biopsy avoidance in 49-58% of men without csPCa while maintaining 90% sensitivity. The diagnostic performance of PHI density and TZ volume-adjusted PHI was statistically superior to PSA density and TZ volume-adjusted PSA, demonstrating improved discriminative ability at key clinical thresholds.
conclusionVolume-adjusted p2PSA-derived indices demonstrated improved diagnostic performance and may reduce unnecessary biopsies. Their validation in a PHI-independent prospective design supports robust clinical applicability.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42262690What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.