ArticleHealth care analysis : HCA : journal of health philosophy and policy2026
Rethinking Health System Readiness for Frailty Management: Frontline Perspectives from Indonesia and Malaysia.
Article in Health care analysis : HCA : journal of health philosophy and policy, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Frailty is a major concern for healthy ageing, reflecting declining functional capacity and increased vulnerability. Beyond clinical implications, frailty raises questions about how health systems recognise vulnerability, allocate responsibilities, and ensure equitable care. These challenges align with the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). Health system readiness refers to the capacity of health systems to adapt policies, infrastructure, and operational processes to integrate frailty care into routine service delivery. In low- and middle-income contexts, frailty remains insufficiently embedded within health system frameworks, limiting coordinated responses. This study examines how readiness for frailty care is understood and enacted by frontline healthcare professionals. Using a qualitative design, five focus group discussions were conducted (March-July 2024) across healthcare settings in Indonesia and Malaysia. Nineteen participants, representing nursing, medicine, physiotherapy, and pharmacy, were purposively recruited. Data were audio-recorded, transcribed verbatim, and analysed using inductive thematic analysis supported by NVivo. Analytical rigour was enhanced through investigator triangulation, team-based coding, and member checking. Four interrelated themes reveal systemic gaps. Frailty remains largely invisible in policy and clinical frameworks; professional roles are fragmented and weakly coordinated; care responsibilities are displaced to families and communities; and structural resource constraints limit implementation. These findings indicate uneven readiness. Strengthening readiness requires alignment across governance, service delivery, and workforce capacity to address inequities in the distribution of care responsibilities. Frailty thus emerges as a critical lens for evaluating health system governance in ageing societies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42262685What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.