ArticleAnatomical science international2026
Structural and functional anatomy of the retinaculum cutis: review and new insights.
Article in Anatomical science international, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Practitioners worldwide have become interested in fascia and how it relates to human appearance and movement. Our study describes an anatomic layer containing connective tissue attachments between the dermis and threconstructive surgery and physical therapye underlying deep investing fascia. Classically labeled as the retinacula cutis (RCs) or fatty septa within the hypodermis, we sometimes refer to these connective tissue attachments as the subcutaneous endoskeleton or Cinderella Layer for their overlooked importance. The significance of these structural attachments as functional tethers has, to a large degree, been neglected. We are adding a descriptive classification system to various types of RCs, while further exploring the important clinical implications of the anatomy through a lens of reconstructive surgery and physical therapy. Dissection of 25 fresh, lightly embalmed, and hypertonic saline embalmed cadavers complemented years of clinical observation to identify and describe consistent relationships between the skin, hypodermis, fascia, and, in some cases, periosteum. We qualitatively noted whether the connective tissue attachments within the hypodermis were long or short, dense or filmy, elastic or rigid, and further subdivided the collagen and elastin bands into functional categories. Identification of the RCs was also attempted on sections from the Visible Human Project (National Library of Medicine). Our dissections revealed numerous and consistent attachments between the fascia and dermis. These RCs are found to have distributed fascial-dermal attachments with directional organization. The origin is typically a continuous fascial covering of muscle or bone, and the insertion is the dermal layer of the skin. The gross morphology of these attachments reinforces their aesthetic and functional purpose as a boundary, anchor, animator, accordion or elastic framework. In most areas of the body, the RCs serve more than one of these purposes. A few of these complex areas are highlighted separately. Gaining an appreciation for the concept of fascial-dermal attachments that define the human body as an organized network of compartments, contours, and creases is relevant to the surgeon, therapist, artist, and student of anatomy alike. Once recognized, their function can often be appreciated. Cataloging and categorizing the RCs with respect to their morphological and functional variability is a crucial addition to modern clinical anatomy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42262672What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.