ArticleResearch in health services & regions2026
Regional variation in healthcare utilization among patients with depression in Germany: a multilevel analysis with PopGrouper-based multimorbidity adjustment.
Article in Research in health services & regions, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundDepression is associated with a substantial health and economic burden and shows pronounced regional variation in Germany. While socioeconomic and urban-rural differences in depression prevalence and service use are well documented, less is known about how regional socioeconomic deprivation and urbanization relate to healthcare utilization after accounting for multimorbidity.
methodsWe analyzed nationwide claims data from a large German sickness fund including adults with diagnosed depression (N = 1,083,319). Healthcare utilization in 2023 was measured as healthcare costs, days of sickness absence, any outpatient mental health specialist contact, and outpatient psychotherapy use. Multilevel regression models with individuals nested within 96 spatial planning regions were estimated, adjusting for age, sex, and multimorbidity using the PopGrouper. Regional socioeconomic deprivation was measured using the German Index of Socioeconomic Deprivation, and urbanization was classified as urban, semi-urban, or rural. Proportional variance component analyses quantified explained regional heterogeneity.
resultsHigher regional socioeconomic deprivation was significantly associated with more days of sickness absence (adjusted mean: 34.1 days in the least vs. 40.1 days in the most deprived regions) and a lower likelihood of receiving outpatient psychotherapy (17.9% vs. 16.3%). No significant associations were observed between deprivation and healthcare costs or mental health specialist contacts. Urban regions were associated with higher healthcare costs (2,284€ vs. 2,188€) and more frequent mental health specialist contacts (15.6% vs. 13.5%). Overall regional clustering was modest but most pronounced for mental health specialist contacts.
conclusionRegional socioeconomic deprivation is linked to higher sickness absence due to depression. Regional inequalities in access to mental health services are small but largely unexplained by deprivation, urbanization, and multimorbidity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.