ArticleMolecular biology reports2026
Efficient lentivirus concentration using a tabletop centrifuge.
Article in Molecular biology reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundEfficient virus concentration is a crucial prerequisite for many research applications including gene delivery using lentiviral vectors, antiviral drug screening, and studies of viral infection mechanisms. Typically, concentration methods involve the pelleting of viral particles and their resuspension in a defined medium to allow precise experimental control over the viral titer and media composition. However, commonly used techniques, such as ultracentrifugation, PEG precipitation or density gradient centrifugation, while effective, are limited by their fairly high cost, significant processing times, and limited availability.
resultsOur study demonstrates that virus concentration using a tabletop centrifuge at 16,100 g yields higher virus titers and allows superior infection efficiencies compared to PEG precipitation-based methods. Furthermore, we optimized the protocol by reducing the centrifugation time to as little as 15 min, while maintaining effective virus enrichment.
conclusionsWe demonstrate that a rapid 15-minute centrifugation using a tabletop centrifuge is sufficient for robust virus concentration. This streamlined approach enhances viral titers, enables efficient medium exchange, and offers a cost-effective and accessible alternative to conventional protocol, particularly valuable in high-biosafety-level laboratories where access to specialized equipment such as ultracentrifuges is often constrained.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.