ArticleSleep & breathing = Schlaf & Atmung2026
The impact of short-term ambient air pollution on CPAP therapy outcomes in obstructive sleep apnea.
Article in Sleep & breathing = Schlaf & Atmung, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeTo determine whether short-term exposure to ambient air pollution adversely impacts the effectiveness of CPAP therapy in patients with diagnosed Obstructive Sleep Apnea (OSA).
methodsIn a retrospective cohort study of 185 patients with diagnosed OSA using CPAP therapy, we analyzed the associations between daily levels of Particulate Matter (PM
resultsStatistically significant inverse associations were observed between air pollution and nightly CPAP usage (e.g., a 0.5 µg/m³ increase in BC was associated with a reduction of 4.6 min per night). Effects were cumulative across several days, with no significant impact on single-day exposures. No clinically meaningful associations were observed for residual AHI or mask leakage. Subgroup analyses suggested slightly stronger reductions in women and high-adherence users, but these effects remained small.
conclusionShort-term exposure to ambient air pollution is associated with minor reductions in CPAP usage; however, the effect size is small and unlikely to be clinically significant in a low-pollution settings. CPAP effectiveness, as measured by residual AHI and mask performance, appears unaffected. These findings suggest that CPAP therapy remains robust despite typical variations in environmental air quality, and the clinical relevance of pollution-driven adherence changes is limited.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42262660What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.