ReviewCurrent medical science2026
Immune-Mediated Inflammatory Diseases: Addressing Safety Concerns and Enhancing the Accessibility of Biosimilars.
Review in Current medical science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Immune-mediated inflammatory diseases (IMIDs), including psoriasis, lupus, multiple sclerosis, and inflammatory bowel disease, are chronic conditions characterized by immune dysregulation and excessive inflammatory cytokine expression. Biologic therapies have transformed IMID management, and the introduction of biosimilars has improved treatment accessibility by reducing costs and alleviating the burden on healthcare systems. Despite regulatory approval and demonstration of similarity to reference biologics, biosimilar adoption remains limited due to uncertainties regarding interchangeability and extrapolation, insufficient communication among stakeholders, and the nocebo effect that influences patient and physician confidence. Although regulatory agencies provide detailed guidance and European Public Assessment Reports, regulatory and perceptual barriers persist in clinical practice. This work reviews real-world and clinical trial data on switching from reference biologics to biosimilars in IMIDs and demonstrates comparable safety and efficacy outcomes. However, patient perceptions and communication strategies significantly influence treatment success. Despite the available evidence, negative perceptions and a lack of confidence persist among both patients and healthcare professionals. Promoting understanding and confidence in biosimilars can increase access and availability and, consequently, enhance the benefits associated with their wider use. Therefore, addressing educational, regulatory, and clinical practice gaps is essential for optimizing biosimilar integration in IMID management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.