ArticleRadiological physics and technology2026
Visualization of nonlinearity in image reconstruction using nonlocal means filters for regularization under noisy conditions.
Article in Radiological physics and technology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The nonlocal means (NLM) filter is inherently nonlinear because its weighting coefficients depend on image intensities; however, how this nonlinearity manifests when NLM is used as a regularization term in image reconstruction has not been fully clarified. This study aimed to visualize and characterize the influence of NLM-induced nonlinearity on reconstructed images through numerical simulations. We first mathematically demonstrated-using reductio ad absurdum and direct proof-that NLM is a nonlinear filter. A two-dimensional disk source, and the BrainWeb dataset were used as test objects. Ideal parallel-beam projection data and projection data containing Poisson noise were used. Image reconstruction was performed using least squares (LS). NLM-based regularization enforcing the reconstructed image to match the NLM-filtered result (adsorption model). Evaluation metrics included the difference image, the relative L1 norm of the difference image, the profile curve, and the area under the profile curve. LS regularized with NLM exhibited linear approximation behavior in the absence of noise if regularization and NLM parameter carefully chosen. The presence of noise amplified nonlinear effects. These findings indicate that comparing mathematical formula with image-based evaluation metrics is useful for understanding how NLM regularization affects reconstructed images under different input conditions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42262636What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.