ArticleInsights into imaging2026
Toward a standardized and interoperable imaging biomarker catalog.
Article in Insights into imaging, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
introductionImaging biomarkers are quantifiable features extracted from medical images that indicate health status, disease characteristics, or treatment response. Their value depends on rigorous standardization and validation-efforts advanced by QIBA and EIBALL. Variability in existing inventories highlights the need for a FAIR (Findable, Accessible, Interoperable, Reusable)-compliant catalog to enable systematic discovery, comparison, and adoption. MATERIALS AND
methodsWe focused on defining the essential variables to describe imaging biomarkers across research, regulatory, and clinical settings. A three-phase approach was undertaken: (1) key resources-including FDA-NIH BEST, QIBA, EMA, ESR-EIBALL, relevant regulations, and scientific literature-were reviewed; (2) attributes were extracted and compared, with redundancies resolved by expert consensus; and (3) consolidated variables were organized into domains aligned with FAIR principles.
resultsA unified biomarker descriptor set was established across five domains: core identification (imaging biomarker name, surrogation, clinical relevance), clinical context (main target, organ(s), disease/substrate, range(s), actionability), imaging and technical information (image modality, acquisition technique, technical parameters, extraction, association type, dimensionality, units), validation (robustness and use endorsed by publications, endorsed by professional societies, regulatory qualifications), and administrative data (repository, version/author). The catalog was tested across representative imaging biomarkers in inflammatory diseases, including ADC, FDG-PET, CT-based radiomics signatures, and Doppler ultrasound indices, demonstrating coherent descriptions across diseases and organs. Diagnostic and prognostic roles were clarified, transparency and reproducibility were promoted, and the need for context-adapted entries was shown.
conclusionThis work proposes a harmonized, scalable approach for cataloging imaging biomarkers. Consistent descriptors across contexts facilitate integration into research, regulatory, and clinical workflows. CRITICAL RELEVANCE: This work proposes a unified catalog structure for imaging biomarkers that improves standardization, comparability, and reusability across clinical, research, and regulatory domains. KEY POINTS: Lack of standardization limits the integration of imaging biomarkers into research, regulatory, and clinical workflows. A harmonized catalog was developed using unified descriptors across the main identified domains. This structure enhances traceability, cross-disease comparability, and regulatory readiness of imaging biomarkers.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.