ReviewSurgical and radiologic anatomy : SRA2026
The role of metacognitive skills in anatomy education: a narrative review.
Review in Surgical and radiologic anatomy : SRA, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundMetacognition, defined as "thinking about thinking," is an essential skill that enables medical students to navigate the cognitive complexity of anatomy curricula. By fostering learners' abilities to monitor comprehension, recognise knowledge gaps, and strategically regulate their learning approaches, metacognition supports both academic achievement and lifelong learning. This narrative review provides a comprehensive overview of the role of metacognitive skills in anatomy education. It examines existing literature and educational interventions to provide insights into developing and applying these skills for students and educators.
methodsA targeted literature search was conducted across major electronic databases, including PubMed, Scopus, and ERIC. The search used a Boolean string combining terms related to metacognition with those for anatomy and health professions education. The review included a broad range of article types to synthesise diverse applications and theoretical underpinnings.
resultsMultiple studies show that explicit, integrated metacognitive interventions-such as structured training, reflective writing, and flipped classroom methodologies-are associated with improvements in metacognitive awareness. These approaches appear most effective when incorporated as ongoing, course-specific activities rather than as isolated sessions. Notably, while metacognitive knowledge improves readily, the development of self-regulatory learning behaviours requires sustained scaffolding and practice.
conclusionThe literature suggests metacognition as a crucial skill for academic success in anatomy and for a successful career as a health professional. An integrated pedagogical approach that combines strategies such as retrieval practice, peer teaching, and reflective writing appears essential. This approach fosters deep, lasting learning and empowers students to become self-directed, resilient learners who can continually adapt to new challenges throughout their careers.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42262617What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.