ArticleSocial psychiatry and psychiatric epidemiology2026
Experiences of discrimination and positive treatment among people who support a person with a mental health condition: a nationally representative survey.
Article in Social psychiatry and psychiatric epidemiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeStigma and discrimination compound the burden experienced by informal caregivers of people with mental illness, impacting their wellbeing. Prior caregiver stigma research has relied on qualitative or convenience samples, limiting knowledge of groups most affected. This Australian study is the first nationally representative survey of caregiver experiences of discrimination and positive treatment.
methodsParticipants (N = 2,164) were recruited from a probability-based online panel using stratified random sampling and weighting for age, gender, education, and language background. Descriptive statistics examined prevalence of stigma, discrimination and positive treatment experiences. Multiple regression models were used to assess sociodemographic differences in experiences and associations with psychological distress and wellbeing.
resultsPositive treatment experiences were common, with 67.9% (95% CI: 65.4, 70.2) of caregivers reporting understanding from friends and family and 59.6% (95% CI: 57.1, 62.1) feeling valued by the care recipient's treating team. However, 34.3% (95% CI: 31.9, 36.8) reported role concealment, and 18.8% (95% CI: 16.8, 20.9) unfavourable treatment at least sometimes. Positive treatment experiences were more prevalent among caregivers who were older or with higher levels of education, whereas experiences of discrimination were more common among caregivers from non-English speaking backgrounds. Women were less likely to conceal their caregiving role. Positive treatment was associated with lower distress and higher wellbeing, whereas discrimination was associated with higher distress and lower wellbeing.
conclusionDespite encouraging levels of support, experiences of caregiver discrimination are common and impact on psychological distress and wellbeing. Multi-pronged strategies are needed to address inequities, strengthen peer support and caregiver-inclusive practice frameworks.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42262591What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.