ArticleEuropean archives of psychiatry and clinical neuroscience2026
Affective forecasting in people with autistic traits, social anhedonia, and subthreshold depression: a multi-method study.
Article in European archives of psychiatry and clinical neuroscience, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The ability to predict future emotions for upcoming events (affective forecasting, AF) is crucial for mental health. This study compared the distinct and shared characteristics of AF in participants with high levels of autistic traits (AT, n = 76), social anhedonia (SA, n = 107), subthreshold depression (SD, n = 102), and 99 controls. Participants completed the laboratory-based and real-life AF tasks, and resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging. Compared with controls, the AT group reported fewer mental simulation details in the laboratory-based task, and the SA group displayed less anticipated pleasure and fewer mental simulation details in both laboratory-based and real-life AF tasks, whereas the SD group showed relatively intact AF. The three subclinical groups showed larger AF bias than controls. Moreover, the three subclinical groups showed altered functional connectivity (FC) compared with controls, and the altered FC was associated with laboratory-based and real-life AF performance. These findings advance our understanding of early identification and prevention strategies of transdiagnostic populations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42262563What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.