ArticleSkeletal radiology2026
A case of atypical orf virus infection of the hand in an immunocompromised patient.
Article in Skeletal radiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Human orf virus infection is a rare zoonotic disease that can clinically and radiologically mimic inflammatory or neoplastic conditions. Typical orf infection presents in immunocompetent individuals as a self-limited cutaneous lesion on the hands or fingers. Typical orf infection evolves through characteristic stages, including a targetoid nodule with central necrosis, white halo, and peripheral erythema, and usually resolves spontaneously within 4-8 weeks. In contrast, atypical orf infection occurs predominantly in immunocompromised patients and is characterized by giant, persistent, or disseminated tumor-like lesions with a prolonged and often recurrent course. In this case report, we present the imaging and histopathological findings of confirmed orf virus infection, illustrating the close correlation between radiologic features and the underlying pathology. We describe the clinical course of atypical orf viral infection presenting as an enlarging exophytic digital mass of the hand in a post-transplant patient, highlighting the challenges in diagnosis and management of atypical viral infectious lesions in immunocompromised patients, which may mimic the clinical presentation of a malignant tumor. Typical imaging findings include well-circumscribed dermal or subcutaneous nodules with peripheral enhancement and surrounding inflammatory reaction, corresponding histologically to epidermal hyperplasia with eosinophilic intracytoplasmic inclusion bodies. Recognizing this radiology-pathology correlation is essential, as atypical cases may raise concern for bacterial abscess, atypical mycobacterial infection, cutaneous lymphoma, or squamous cell carcinoma. Awareness of these features can help radiologists and pathologists suggest the correct diagnosis and prevent unnecessary procedures.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42262511What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.