ReviewArchives of microbiology2026
CRISPR-based gene editing for antimicrobial resistance control in human medicine.
Review in Archives of microbiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
A Phase 1, Randomized, Double-Blind, First-In-Human, Dose Escalation Study Investigating the Safety, Recovery, and Pharmacodynamics of Multiple Oral Administrations of SNIPR001 in Healthy Subjects
A Feasibility and Acceptability Pilot Study Evaluating a Patient-Specific Targeted Intervention Using Patient Navigators or Routine Clinical Care
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- CRISPR/Cas system as a novel therapeutic strategy to combat multi-drug-resistant bacteria.Archives of microbiology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) has already become one of the most urgent threats to the public health of this century. In 2019 alone, it directly causes about 1.27 million deaths and it was estimated that 1.91 million people will die yearly by 2050 should present trends persist. The traditional antibiotic development pipelines have been shown to be structurally insufficient to meet the rate at which bacterial populations have developed, diversified and spread resistance determinants, typically by horizontal gene transfer. In this context, CRISPR-Cas gene editing has become a focused antimicrobial approach that can selectively target resistance genes, virulence factors, and mobile genetic elements without the broad-spectrum collateral damage associated with conventional antibiotics. The review assesses CRISPR-Cas systems, namely Cas9, Cas12a, Cas3, and Cas13 in the context of two complementary mechanistic strategies namely selective killing of pathogens and antibiotic resensitization by the targeted disruption of gene resistance. We compare the impact of key delivery systems, such as bacteriophage vectors, lipid nanoparticles, and conjugative plasmids, evaluating them based on their therapeutic activity, host selectivity, and possible translation. The present state of clinical translations is discussed, including the two most advanced clinical-stage candidates SNIPR001 (Phase I/II, NCT05277350) and LBP-EC01 (Phase 2/3, NCT05488444). We also address the open issues that include off-target editing, host immune reactions, bacterial counter-resistance, regulatory ambiguity, and scalability of manufacturing. Lastly, we provide priority research directions, such as the combination antimicrobial strategies, AI-assisted CRISPR design, and next-generation delivery engineering, none of which will be resolved before routine clinical application of CRISPR-based antimicrobials is achieved.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42262436What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.