Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42262278›Full record

ArticleGenome biology and evolution2026

PolyAdapt: Characterizing Polygenic Adaptive Architectures in the Presence of Strong Linkage Disequilibrium.

Rupert Mazzucco, Christian Schlötterer

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genome biology and evolution, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Rupert MazzuccoInstitut für Populationsgenetik, Vetmeduni Vienna, Wien 1210, Austria.ORCID 0000-0002-7608-0196
Christian SchlöttererInstitut für Populationsgenetik, Vetmeduni Vienna, Wien 1210, Austria.ORCID 0000-0003-4710-6526

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Characterizing the genetic architecture of adaptation remains a central challenge in population genetics, particularly when multiple loci contribute to selected phenotypes. Two-genotype experimental evolution studies offer a powerful framework for this purpose, yet existing methods lack the capacity for genome-wide inference of selection targets and their coefficients under linkage. Here, we introduce polyAdapt, a novel iterative algorithm that identifies selected haplotype blocks and estimates the associated selection coefficients from Pool-Seq data in two-genotype experiments. Rather than exploring all possible combinations of selection targets simultaneously, polyAdapt sequentially incorporates targets of decreasing effect, accounting for linked selection at each step and optimizing both selection coefficients and effective population size through comparison of empirical and simulated replicate allele frequency trajectories. Using simulated data sets, we demonstrate that polyAdapt accurately recovers selection targets and coefficients for oligogenic architectures (5 and 13 targets) and provides a lower bound on the number of contributing loci for polygenic architectures (50 targets). Applied to yeast experimental evolution data, polyAdapt infers a highly polygenic architecture with at least 20 selected haplotype blocks per chromosome, consistent with independent estimates from the literature. polyAdapt thus represents a flexible and powerful tool for dissecting the genetic architecture of adaptation in experimental evolution studies.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsLinkage DisequilibriumMultifactorial InheritanceEvolution, MolecularHaplotypesModels, GeneticSaccharomyces cerevisiaeSelection, Genetic2 genotypesexperimental evolutionhaploblockspolygenic adaptationsimulation

Identifiers

PMID42262278
PMCPMC13281831

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.