Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42262065›Full record

ArticleHealth promotion international2026

Discourses on children and health in National Public Health Policy documents: examples from Sweden and Norway.

Ulrika Lögdberg, Zofia Hammerin, Gita Hedin, Olin Oldeide, Thomas Tjelta, Berit Misund Dahl, Anne Clancy

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health promotion international, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Ulrika LögdbergKarolinska Institutet, Department of Learning, Informatics, Management and Ethics (LIME), National Centre for Suicide Research and Prevention (NASP), 171 77 Stockholm, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0003-4515-6634
Zofia HammerinDepartment of Education and Art, Mälardalen University, Universitetsplatsen 1, 721 23 Västerås, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0003-4380-5143
Gita HedinFaculty of Health and Science, Kristianstad University, Elmetorpsvägen 8, 291 88 Kristianstad, Sweden.
Olin OldeideDepartment of Health Promotion and Development (HEMIL), University of Bergen, P.O. Box 7807, NO-5020 Bergen, Norway.ORCID 0000-0001-5620-8220
Thomas TjeltaFaculty of Health and Social Sciences, University of South-Eastern Norway, Kjølnes Ring 56, 3918 Porsgrunn, Norway.ORCID 0009-0006-8471-8109
Berit Misund DahlDepartment of Health Sciences, NTNU-Norwegian University of Science and Technology, P.O. Box 1517, NO-6025 Ålesund, Norway.ORCID 0000-0002-8917-356X
Anne ClancyFaculty of Health Sciences, Department of Health and Care Sciences, UiT, the Arctic University of Norway, Postboks 1063, 9480 Harstad, Norway.ORCID 0000-0003-0805-2588

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Promoting the health of children remains a global and national priority, as reflected in the proliferation of public health policies, strategies, and guidelines over the past decade. While these documents aim to improve health outcomes, they also play a critical role in shaping how children and young people are constructed as health subjects. This study critically examines recent national public health policy documents from Sweden and Norway through a health promotion lens, focusing on the discursive positioning of children. Drawing on theoretical insights from critical childhood studies and public health policy research to frame our discourse analysis, we identify dominant narratives that frame children primarily as passive, dependent, and vulnerable. These adult-centric discourses, rooted in risk and knowledge paradigms, offer limited space for agency, participation, or rights-based approaches. Despite strong rhetorical commitments to equality and child health, the policies risk reinforcing hierarchical power relations and deficit-based views of childhood. We argue that aligning public health policy with health promotion principles requires reframing children not merely as future investments, but as present rights-holders and active contributors to their own health. Embedding participatory mechanisms and expanding comparative research across welfare contexts may foster more inclusive and empowering policy development. This study contributes to ongoing debates on child agency, policy framing, and the role of discourse in shaping health promotion practice.

Indexed as

Child HealthHealth PolicyHealth PromotionChildDocument AnalysisHumansNorwayPolicy MakingPublic HealthSwedenagencychildrencritical discourse analysishealth promotionpolicyyoung people

Identifiers

PMID42262065
PMCPMC13248202

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.