ArticleUlusal travma ve acil cerrahi dergisi = Turkish journal of trauma & emergency surgery : TJTES2026
Can clinical scoring systems overcome the limitations of diagnostic methods for acute appendicitis in pregnancy?
Article in Ulusal travma ve acil cerrahi dergisi = Turkish journal of trauma & emergency surgery : TJTES, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAcute appendicitis during pregnancy is the most common indication for non-obstetric emergency surgery. However, physiological changes associated with pregnancy can reduce the sensitivity of its clinical signs and symptoms. This study aimed to compare the diagnostic performance of the Alvarado, Appendicitis Inflammatory Response (AIR), Raja Isteri Pengiran Anak Saleha Appendicitis (RIPASA), and Tzanakis scoring systems in pregnant patients, as well as to evaluate surgical outcomes.
methodsA total of 39 pregnant patients who underwent surgery for acute appendicitis between January 2017 and January 2025 were retrospectively analyzed. Demographic characteristics, gestational age, clinical presentation, laboratory parameters (white blood cell count [WBC], C-reactive protein [CRP]), ultrasonography findings, surgical approach (open vs. laparoscopic), histopathological results, and maternal and fetal outcomes were recorded. Alvarado, AIR, RIPASA, and Tzanakis scores were calculated for each patient. Patients were stratified into risk categories based on established cut-off values from the literature, and diagnostic performance was assessed against histopathological findings.
resultsThe mean age was 26.0±5.3 years, and the mean gestational age was 19.6±7.9 weeks; 53.8% of patients were in the second trimester. Open appendectomy was performed in 61.5% of cases, while 38.5% underwent laparoscopic appendectomy. High-risk classification rates were 66.7% for Alvarado, 69.2% for AIR, and 79.5% for both RIPASA and Tzanakis scores. Histopathology confirmed acute appendicitis in 66.7% of patients, perforated appendicitis in 15.4%, and a normal appendix in 17.9%. WBC and CRP levels were significantly higher in patients with confirmed appendicitis (p<0.05). The highest sensitivity and specificity were observed with the RIPASA (93.7% and 85.7%, respectively) and Tzanakis (90.6% and 71.4%) scoring systems. Laparoscopic surgery was associated with a shorter hospital stay compared to open surgery (p<0.001), with comparable maternal and fetal safety outcomes.
conclusionClinical scoring systems are effective and reliable tools for diagnosing acute appendicitis in pregnant patients, with the RIPASA score demonstrating the highest diagnostic accuracy. Elevated CRP levels and leukocytosis may further support diagnosis. Laparoscopic appendectomy is a safe option associated with a shorter hospital stay compared with open surgery. These findings support the safe use of both clinical scoring systems and laparoscopic surgery in pregnant patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.