ReviewPaediatric anaesthesia2026
Role of Angiotensin II as a Vasoactive Agent to Treat Distributive Shock With a Focus on Preliminary Data in Pediatric-Aged Patients.
Review in Paediatric anaesthesia, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In pediatric-aged patients, distributive (vasoplegic) shock is commonly caused by sepsis, anaphylaxis, or the humoral/immunologic response following cardiopulmonary bypass. In general, the first-line vasoactive agent for children is epinephrine or norepinephrine. In cases of fluid-refractory shock requiring escalating doses of catecholamines, adjunct therapies such as vasopressin, hydrocortisone, hydroxycobalamin-ascorbic acid, and methylene blue may be introduced. In 2017, the FDA approved a synthetic human angiotensin II (AT-II) infusion preparation for treating adult patients with refractory vasodilatory shock. The following educational review examines the role of AT-II as a vasoactive agent in the treatment of distributive shock with a focus on pediatric patients. A systematic search of the literature was performed to identify key publications regarding the therapeutic use of AT-II for the treatment of distributive shock in adult and pediatric patients. Prospective studies in adult patients demonstrate the efficacy of AT-II to treat refractory vasodilatory shock when escalating doses of conventional vasoactive agents (norepinephrine ≥ 0.2-0.3 μg/kg/min) have failed. In these scenarios, AT-II has been added as the third or fourth medication. There are limited trials evaluating AT-II as the primary agent for vasodilatory shock in adults. The majority of studies have shown an improvement in mean arterial pressure (MAP); however, there has been limited impact on long-term survival. Pediatric evidence to date has included 5 case reports and two larger retrospective case series encompassing a total of 44 patients. Although AT-II was generally effective in increasing the MAP, given the non-randomized and non-prospective nature of these studies, information regarding the impact on long-term outcomes is not available. Both adult and pediatric reports have outlined the potential utility of AT-II in treating vasodilatory shock as primarily a rescue agent when conventional vasoactive agents fail or dose requirements escalate. To date, evidence-based medicine demonstrates an increase in MAP with the ability to wean other vasoactive agents. The current studies do not appear to uniformly and clearly define a survival benefit. Future studies should focus on the potential survival impact of this novel vasoactive agent, further define dosing strategies, and more clearly outline its role as a primary agent or when other vasoactive agents fail.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.