Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42261754›Full record

ReviewAdvanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany)2026

Advances in Cancer Immunotherapy for Solid Tumors.

Shira Gabizon-Peretz, Harriet M Kluger

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Shira Gabizon-PeretzMedical Oncology, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1494-6510
Harriet M KlugerMedical Oncology, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4932-9873

Funding

Davidoff Foundation Fellowship
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cancer immunotherapy has fundamentally transformed the management of solid tumors, ranging from immune checkpoint blockade to a broader spectrum of immune-modulating strategies. While inhibitors of CTLA-4 and the PD-1/PD-L1 axis remain central to clinical practice, heterogeneous clinical responses, immune-related toxicities, and different resistance mechanisms underscore the need for next-generation approaches. This review integrates recent advances in cancer immunotherapy for solid tumors, with an emphasis on emerging biological concepts and therapeutic platforms that extend beyond classical checkpoint inhibition. We discuss novel immune checkpoints, biomarker-driven approvals, and the expanding role of immunotherapy in different disease settings. Antibody-based platforms are highlighted as strategies that integrate direct tumor targeting with immune activation, which have reshaped standards of care in several malignancies. We further review advances in adoptive cellular therapies as well as next-generation cytokine therapies and cancer vaccines aimed at enhancing tumor-specific immune responses while mitigating systemic toxicity. Finally, we address key unresolved challenges, including mechanisms of resistance, optimization of sequencing and dosing strategies, and clinical trial design considerations. Together, these developments reflect a rapidly evolving field focused on broadening efficacy, improving safety, and personalizing treatment in solid tumors.

Indexed as

Immune Checkpoint InhibitorsImmunotherapyNeoplasmsCancer VaccinesHumansCancer VaccinesImmune Checkpoint Inhibitorsbispecific antibodiescancer vaccinescellular therapiesimmune checkpoint inhibitorsimmunotherapy resistanceperioperative immunotherapysolid tumor immunotherapy

Identifiers

PMID42261754
PMCPMC13292180

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.