ArticleJournal of esthetic and restorative dentistry : official publication of the American Academy of Esthetic Dentistry ... [et al.]2026
Influence of Surface Conditioning Protocols and Lining Materials on the Fracture Resistance of Aged 3D-Printed Onlay Restorations.
Article in Journal of esthetic and restorative dentistry : official publication of the American Academy of Esthetic Dentistry ... [et al.], 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveThis in vitro study evaluated the effects of surface conditioning protocols and lining material type on fracture resistance and failure behavior of 3D-printed methacrylate resin onlay restorations. MATERIALS AND
methodsOne hundred twenty 3D-printed onlays were fabricated and allocated to four surface conditioning protocols: no treatment, airborne particle abrasion with aluminum oxide (Al
resultsTwo-way ANOVA revealed that the surface conditioning protocol (p < 0.001) and lining material (p < 0.001) had a significant influence on fracture resistance, with a significant interaction between the two factors (p = 0.003). Surface-treated specimens showed significantly higher fracture resistance than untreated controls (p < 0.05). The combined Al
conclusionsOptimized surface conditioning combined with flowable composite lining enhances fracture resistance and interfacial integrity of 3D-printed resin onlay restorations. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: From the clinical perspective, enhanced surface conditioning accompanied by flowable composite lining seems to be an effective approach for augmenting the fracture resistance and longevity of repaired or relined 3D-printed resin onlay restorations postaging.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.