ReviewCNS neuroscience & therapeutics2026
Neuroprotective Effects of Phenothiazines on Acute Ischemic Stroke.
Review in CNS neuroscience & therapeutics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundStandard therapeutic strategies for acute ischemic stroke (AIS) include endovascular mechanical thrombectomy, intravenous thrombolysis, bridging therapy, and conventional conservative treatment. Despite the implementation of standardized treatments, nearly half of patients still experience significant motor or speech dysfunction, severely impacting their quality of life. Consequently, there is a pressing need for effective neuroprotective adjunctive therapies to further improve functional outcomes and prognosis. Phenothiazines, primarily chlorpromazine and promethazine (C + P), have been proposed as potential neuroprotective agents. Preclinical evidence suggests that phenothiazines may induce mild hypothermic responses, exert anti-inflammatory effects, and promote a hypometabolic state, thereby potentially contributing to improved neurological outcomes.
methodsWe reviewed and synthesized the mechanisms underlying the neuroprotective effects of phenothiazines, with a particular focus on C + P.
resultsThis review highlights the neuroprotective mechanisms of phenothiazines related to mild hypothermia, anti-inflammation, and metabolic reduction, along with relevant preclinical and clinical evidence. We also compare the distinct mechanisms of action between C + P and conventional anesthetic sedatives and draw partial comparisons with natural hibernation. Our findings reveal that C + P possesses unique features and advantages in neuroprotection, particularly regarding metabolic suppression and hypothermia.
conclusionsThis review explores the adjunctive role of phenothiazines following AIS and elucidates their modulatory mechanisms, which may exert neuroprotective effects through multiple pathways and potentially improve AIS outcomes. This approach may facilitate the identification of novel specific targets for conventional drugs, thereby offering a new perspective on addressing the challenges associated with AIS.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.