ArticleMolecular genetics & genomic medicine2026
RETRACTION: LncRNA NEAT1/mir-185-5p/igf2 Axis Regulates the Invasion and Migration of Colon Cancer.
Article in Molecular genetics & genomic medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Retraction of
Authors and funding
0 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
retractionS. Zhuang, Y. Cai, H. Liu, Y. Qin, and J. Wen, "LncRNA NEAT1/mir-185-5p/igf2 Axis Regulates the Invasion and Migration of Colon Cancer," Molecular Genetics & Genomic Medicine 8, no. 4 (2020): e1125, https://doi.org/10.1002/mgg3.1125. The above article, published online on 20 February 2020 in Wiley Online Library (wileyonlinelibrary.com), has been retracted by agreement between the authors; the journal Editor-in-Chief, Paraminder Dhillon; and Wiley Periodicals, LLC. The retraction has been agreed due to concerns raised by third parties. Specifically, image elements in Figures 1D, 3D, 3E, 4G, and 5C were identified as having been published elsewhere in a different scientific context. As a result, the editors consider the conclusions to be invalid. The authors were unable to adequately address these concerns, noting that, due to the time elapsed since the original publication, retrieval of the underlying raw data for verification would be difficult. The authors therefore requested the retraction of the article.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.