Trial reportSubstance abuse and rehabilitation2026
Effectiveness of the Functional-Cognitive and Sensory Treatment for Improving Daily Functioning of Individuals with Substance Use Disorder: A Randomized Controlled Trial.
Trial report in Substance abuse and rehabilitation, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: To examine the effectiveness of the Functional-Cognitive and Sensory Treatment (F-CaST) for individuals with Substance Use Disorder (SUD), in supporting daily functioning and reducing dropout from the therapeutic community. Patients and Methods: A single-blind randomized controlled trial was conducted in a therapeutic community. Participants were randomly allocated to either the F-CaST group or a control group receiving standard care. The F-CaST consisted of 16 sessions (eight group and eight individual sessions) delivered over eight weeks and focused on teaching strategies individually tailored for executive function deficits and sensory modulation dysfunction linked to participants' personal occupational goals. Assessments were conducted at pre (T1), immediately post-intervention (T2), and at 1- and 3-month follow-ups (T3-T4). Primary outcomes included occupational performance and satisfaction measured by the Canadian Occupational Performance Measure (COPM), dropout rates, and length of stay in the therapeutic community. Results: Thirty-three participants were randomized to F-CaST (n=20) or standard care (n=13). Both groups demonstrated significant improvements in COPM performance and satisfaction over time; however, the F-CaST group showed a more favorable pattern of improvement and higher rates of clinically meaningful change (72% vs. 39% at 3 months). Dropout rates were significantly lower in the F-CaST group at T2 (22% vs. 62%). No significant between-group differences were found in length of stay. Conclusion: F-CaST appears to be a feasible and promising intervention that may support improvements in occupational performance, satisfaction, and early treatment retention among individuals with SUD in therapeutic communities.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.