ArticleCureus2026
Prevalence and Utilization Patterns of Digital Medical Resources in Clinical Practice Among Family Medicine Physicians in Riyadh Health Clusters.
Article in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background The integration of digital medical resources has become increasingly important in supporting evidence-based clinical decision-making. In the context of Saudi Arabia's healthcare transformation, understanding how family physicians utilize these resources during routine clinical practice remains limited. Objective To assess the prevalence, usage patterns, motivations, and perceived barriers related to the use of digital clinical information and decision-support resources during clinic hours among board-certified family medicine physicians working in Riyadh Health Clusters 1, 2, and 3. Methods A cross-sectional study was conducted between January and May 2025 among board-certified family medicine physicians in Riyadh Health Clusters 1, 2, and 3. Data were collected via a self-administered electronic survey distributed during structured site visits. Descriptive statistics and chi-square analyses were performed to examine associations between digital resource utilization and participant demographics. Results A total of 96 participants were included. The majority were aged 25-34 years (n = 61, 63.5%), and most were senior registrars (n = 52, 54.2%). Daily digital resource use was reported by 43 participants (44.8%), with UpToDate being the most utilized resource (n = 36, 37.5%), followed by AMBOSS (n = 19, 19.8%). Access to updated clinical information (n = 55, 57.3%) and improved decision-making (n = 37, 38.5%) were the primary motivations for usage. Younger age, fewer years of clinical experience, and job position were significantly associated with a higher frequency of digital resource utilization (p < 0.05). While most participants perceived positive impacts on clinical efficiency and patient outcomes, barriers such as workflow disruptions, time constraints, and financial limitations were identified. Conclusion Digital medical resources are widely integrated into clinical practice among family medicine physicians in the Riyadh Health Clusters. Utilization patterns vary by physician demographics, with younger and less experienced physicians demonstrating greater reliance. Institutional support, accessibility, and continuous professional development are essential for optimizing digital resource integration into family medicine practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.