ArticleCureus2026
Antibiotic Prescription Practices in Ophthalmology Outpatient Clinics in Khartoum, Sudan: An Observational Cross-Sectional Study.
Article in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAntimicrobial resistance is a growing global health concern, posing serious threats to the population's health and well-being. However, the situation in Sudan is unknown. This study explores antibiotic prescriptions in ophthalmology outpatient clinics in Khartoum.
methodsThis descriptive cross-sectional study was conducted from January to April 2023 across major ophthalmology teaching hospitals in Khartoum. Data were collected using a validated, pretested, anonymous online questionnaire capturing demographic information and responses to five guideline-based clinical vignettes. Analysis was performed via SPSS Version 27 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA).
resultsOf the 215 participants, 64.7% (n=139) were prescribed using brand names, and only 12.6% (n=27) of them had attended a course on prudent antibiotic prescription. Scientific articles or guidelines were the primary sources for practice for 62.8% (n=135) of the total participants; yet, residents mainly depended on asking a senior colleague (42%, n=55). Regarding case-related practice questions, most of the participants complied with the guidelines for grade two hyphema (63.3%, n=136), subconjunctival hemorrhage (80.9%, n=174), and preoperative preparation for cataract surgery (63.7%, n=137). For acute postoperative endophthalmitis, 68.8% (n=148) of the participants used intravitreal antibiotic injections. However, there was no specific preference for certain antibiotics in the case of corneal abrasion.
conclusionThe practice of antibiotic prescription in this study varied among respondents and from the literature. It also highlighted the impact of the work environment on prescription practice, which might be attributable to the deficiency of a unified source of evidence and practice nationally. Therefore, the development of national ophthalmic antibiotic guidelines, structured training, and periodic audits would improve practice patterns.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.