ArticleCureus2026
Retained Bullet in the Orbit Following a Gunshot Wound: Management of Subsequent Complications.
Article in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Gunshot wounds to the craniofacial region are often fatal, and isolated orbital involvement is exceptionally rare. Severe ocular and systemic complications, such as vision loss, neurological damage, and infections, can arise from high-velocity bullet injuries to the orbit. The case presented involves a male patient with two cranial impacts, one of which left a projectile lodged in the retrobulbar space. The initial treatment was surgical reparation of the wounds and observation. However, due to a persistent fever and the development of an abscess, the orbital projectile was removed. The patient's condition improved, but amaurosis remained. In this instance, timely surgical removal of the projectile, guided by a customized risk-benefit analysis, early localization using computed tomography for accurate assessment, and multidisciplinary management to address complex injuries were all crucial elements. Orbital injuries caused by firearms are uncommon and extremely complicated, necessitating timely and individualized treatment to optimize the prognosis. Clinical evaluation should always be the basis for projectile removal decisions, weighing potential risks against benefits.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.