ArticleCureus2026
Research Productivity Among Orthodontic Residents and Fellows Across Training Programs in the United States.
Article in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundOrthodontic residency programs increasingly expect residents to present research and publish in peer-reviewed journals, yet resident satisfaction with research opportunities remains low. Historical data indicate declining research productivity, but comprehensive current assessments are lacking.
objectiveThis study aims to quantify and characterize research productivity among orthodontic residents and fellows across training programs in the United States. MATERIALS AND
methodsUsing ADEA Pass, we identified orthodontic residency and fellowship programs and compiled rosters for graduating classes 2025-2028. For each trainee, we recorded demographics and training details and conducted systematic PubMed searches to identify publications. Publications were analyzed for authorship position, article type, timing relative to residency, dental relevance, journal impact factor, and citation counts. Statistical analyses compared productivity by sex and post-graduate year (PGY) status.
resultsAmong 686 residents and fellows from 42 programs, only 157/686 (23%) had at least one publication, with an average of 0.5 ± 1.8 total publications per trainee. The cohort produced 369 publications, predominantly basic science (152/369, 41%), and published pre-residency (298/369, 81%). Only 73/369 (20%) were first-author publications. PGY 2 residents consistently outperformed residents in other years across all metrics. Males had a higher proportion of dental-related publications than females (114/158 males, 72% vs 135/211 females, 64%; χ²(1, 369) = 3.96, P = 0.029). Comparing final-year residents, longer program duration (3 vs 2 years) did not significantly increase publication output.
conclusionsMost orthodontic trainees have minimal research involvement, with publications concentrated among a few high-output individuals. Despite expectations for scholarly activity, current research productivity suggests inadequate mentorship, resources, or time dedicated to research. Programs must enhance research infrastructure to ensure trainees can critically evaluate and contribute to evolving orthodontic literature.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.