Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42261497›Full record

ArticleCureus2026

Recurrent Cochlear Implant Electrode Exposure in a Smoker With Prior Canal Wall Mastoidectomy: A Case Report.

Loga S Iyer, Anita Jeyakumar

Abstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Loga S IyerOtolaryngology, Northeast Ohio Medical University, Rootstown, USA.
Anita JeyakumarOtolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, HEARS Otology, Akron, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cochlear implantation (CI) is an established and effective surgical intervention for patients with severe to profound sensorineural hearing loss. The procedure involves placement of an internal receiver-stimulator in a postauricular subperiosteal pocket with an electrode advanced through the mastoid and facial recess into the cochlea. Long-term device function depends on secure fixation and durable soft tissue coverage over both the implant and extracochlear electrode segment to prevent skin breakdown, infection, and electrode exposure. Although electrode exposure is uncommon, it represents a serious complication that can compromise implant integrity and frequently necessitates revision surgery or explantation. Patients with prior history of canal wall down (CWD) mastoidectomy are at increased risk of this complication given the altered mastoid anatomy, reduced soft tissue bulk, and compromised vascular supply. In addition, a history of chronic tobacco use further exacerbates these risks by inducing vasoconstriction, reducing tissue oxygenation, and impairing collagen synthesis increasing the likelihood of postoperative skin breakdown. We present a case of recurrent CI electrode exposure in an elderly patient with a remote history of CWD mastoidectomy and chronic tobacco use, highlighting the compounded impact of these factors on postoperative healing and device viability.

Indexed as

canal wall down mastoidectomycochlear implantationelectrode exposureimplant failuresmokingsoft-tissue complicationswound healing

Identifiers

PMID42261497
PMCPMC13242900

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.