ArticleCureus2026
Delayed Catastrophic Uterine Rupture in a Subsequent Pregnancy After Expectant Management of Placenta Accreta Spectrum.
Article in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Placenta accreta spectrum (PAS) is a serious obstetric disorder involving abnormal placental attachment to the uterine wall and is associated with substantial maternal risk. While cesarean hysterectomy remains the standard treatment, conservative management approaches are emerging as alternatives. Minimal data is currently available regarding the long-term complications of conservative management. We present a case of a patient with a history of conservatively managed PAS who presented 14 years later during a subsequent pregnancy with fundal uterine rupture in the second trimester, highlighting the potential long-term risks associated with uterine sparing approaches. A 39-year-old gravida 6 para 5003 woman presented at 26 weeks of gestation with acute abdominal pain and no fetal cardiac activity. Her history was notable for five prior cesarean deliveries, including a classical cesarean in her G4 pregnancy complicated by PAS. In that pregnancy, she underwent multidisciplinary conservative management, including classical cesarean delivery with the placenta left in situ and uterine artery embolization. Her postoperative course was uncomplicated, with successful uterine preservation. In her G6 pregnancy, due to concern for uterine rupture, decision was made to proceed with stat cesarean section. Upon entry into the abdominal cavity, she had experienced a fundal uterine rupture with complete placental separation. The site of the uterine rupture was able to be repaired, and the uterus was left in situ. This case demonstrates that even when conservative, uterine-sparing management of PAS is pursued with careful patient selection and multidisciplinary planning, adverse outcomes can still occur. It highlights the need for long-term surveillance and further research to clarify the risks, outcomes, and reproductive implications of fertility-preserving approaches.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.