ArticleClinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.)2026
Accuracy of Two Novel Self-Contained Darkroom Refractive Screeners Compared with Cycloplegic Retinoscopy and a Traditional Autorefractor in Schoolchildren.
Article in Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To evaluate the clinical performance of two novel self-contained darkroom refractive screeners (Columba 300, YD-SX-A) and a traditional tabletop autorefractor (Topcon KR8800) in refractive screening for children and adolescents, using cycloplegic retinoscopy (CR) as the gold standard, and to provide evidence for equipment selection. Methods: A total of 1354 participants aged 6-18 years were enrolled from December 2025 to February 2026. Non-cycloplegic measurements were performed sequentially with the three devices, followed by CR after cycloplegia with 0.5% tropicamide. Statistical analyses included Wilcoxon signed-rank test, Bland-Altman analysis, linear regression, and ROC curve analysis. Results: The prevalence of myopia, hyperopia, and astigmatism measured by CR was 73.2%, 15.0%, and 35.8%, respectively. All three devices showed strong positive correlation with CR in spherical equivalent (SE, r > 0.9), with Topcon KR8800 presenting the optimal correlation and consistency. YD-SX-A had the smallest mean difference in cylinder power with CR. All devices achieved excellent myopia diagnostic efficacy (AUC > 0.95), while Topcon KR8800 was superior in hyperopia and astigmatism diagnosis. Conclusion: Topcon KR8800 has the highest accuracy for clinical precise screening. Columba 300 and YD-SX-A are portable, rapid, and sensitive for myopia screening, suitable for large-scale preliminary screening. A two-level "initial screening-confirmation" process is recommended for myopia prevention and control in children and adolescents.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.