ReviewBurns & trauma2026
Large language models in emergency and critical care medicine: a comprehensive review of applications, challenges, and future directions.
Review in Burns & trauma, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Emergency and critical care medicine requires the rapid synthesis of heterogeneous clinical data under extreme time constraints. Early artificial intelligence tools lacked the flexibility to manage real-world patient heterogeneity. Large language models (LLMs) offer a paradigm shift by demonstrating advanced natural language understanding, cross-task generalization, and context-sensitive reasoning, thereby bridging the gap between fragmented algorithms and holistic clinical decision support. The effective deployment of these models is grounded in four methodological pillars: domain adaptation, knowledge integration, multimodal and temporal modeling, and transparency. Domain adaptation and knowledge integration specifically empower the context-sensitive reasoning required for high-stakes intensive care. This theoretical framework enables their application across clinical decision support, documentation optimization, medical education, and clinical research. Integrating continuous physiological waveforms with multi-omics data facilitates dynamic risk stratification for complex conditions like sepsis, while natural language-to-structured query language capabilities accelerate clinical data extraction and quality improvement. The transition of LLMs from experimental settings to routine clinical deployment remains constrained by model hallucinations, multimodal integration barriers, and unresolved ethical governance. Sustainable implementation requires a human-in-the-loop copilot design, rigorous multicenter prospective validation, and transparent regulatory frameworks. Addressing these challenges is essential to ensure that technological innovations safely translate into measurable improvements in patient survival and clinical outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.