ReviewNeuropsychiatric disease and treatment2026
Integration of Traditional Chinese Medicine and Psychotherapy in Mental Health: A Narrative Review of Mechanisms, Clinical Evidence, and Future Directions.
Review in Neuropsychiatric disease and treatment, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: This narrative review critically evaluates the integration of Traditional Chinese Medicine (TCM) and Western psychotherapy in mental health care, identifying current evidence, methodological limitations, and future research priorities. Methods: We narratively synthesized peer-reviewed literature focusing on clinical studies that combined TCM interventions (acupuncture, herbal medicine, TCM exercises such as Baduanjin and Tai Chi) with psychological or psychiatric approaches for mental disorders. Evidence was organized into three levels: clinical efficacy (human RCTs and meta-analyses), mechanistic studies (animal and biomarker research), and exploratory investigations (neuroimaging, omics, observational surveys). Results: Key findings include: (1) TCM interventions combined with pharmacological or psychological treatments for depression showed a pooled standardized mean difference of -2.05 (95% CI: -2.74 to -1.37) from 18 RCTs, indicating a large effect size but with high heterogeneity; (2) TCM exercises (Baduanjin, Tai Chi) improved attention and reduced mild anxiety (P=0.034), though evidence in clinical samples remains limited; (3) Mechanistic studies suggest potential regulation of the HPA axis, monoamine neurotransmitters, inflammation, and gut microbiota, but these findings are preliminary and derived mostly from animal models. Major barriers to integration include: lack of standardized TCM diagnostic criteria; few methodologically rigorous RCTs; high heterogeneity; insufficient cross-training of clinicians; and fundamental conceptual differences between TCM (holistic) and evidence-based psychotherapy (mechanistic). Conclusion: While TCM-psychotherapy integration holds conceptual promise, current evidence is limited by substantial methodological weaknesses. The most robust evidence exists for acupuncture and TCM exercises for depression and anxiety over short-term follow-up (4-12 weeks). Evidence for PTSD, severe mental illness, and long-term outcomes (≥6 months) remains preliminary. Future research should prioritize large, well-blinded RCTs with prespecified TCM syndrome criteria and longer follow-up periods.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.