ArticleOxford open immunology2026
A new patient-led approach to building research infrastructure and evidence generation.
Article in Oxford open immunology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Over recent decades, patient and public involvement (PPI) has become a more established element of health research policy, although its implementation is often criticized for tokenism and for underrepresenting marginalized groups. In fields such as complex chronic illness (CCI), where formal research activity has historically been limited, conventional PPI frameworks have had little scope for meaningful application. Within this context, a new wave of patient-led initiatives has emerged that moves beyond participation in existing systems toward the creation of independent infrastructures for knowledge generation, extending the principle of "nothing about us, without us." This commentary examines Visible, a patient-founded health technology platform that combines daily energy-management tools with research infrastructure for CCIs. This infrastructure enables in-house data analyses and external collaborations, including app-based data studies, investigator-led research, and integration within clinical trials. We explore the advantages of this dual-purpose model, including greater inclusivity, sustained engagement, and richer longitudinal data. We also describe how embedding research functions within tools that patients find directly useful allows evidence generation and patient support to be mutually reinforcing.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.