Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42261323›Full record

ArticleJournal of population economics2026

Work orientations and turnover.

Milena Nikolova, Juliette de Wit

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of population economics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Milena NikolovaUniversity of Groningen, Faculty of Economics and Business, Nettelbosje 2, 9742AE Groningen, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-3247-760X
Juliette de WitUniversity of Groningen, Faculty of Economics and Business, Nettelbosje 2, 9742AE Groningen, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-9297-0172

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Voluntary turnover imposes substantial costs on organizations, yet we know little about whether workers' fundamental orientations toward work shape their mobility decisions. In this paper, we distinguish between job, career, and calling orientations, defined as the long-term beliefs about the role of work in one's life. Using original survey data from the Dutch LISS panel, we show that work orientations are strong predictors of quit intentions and on-the-job search, even after controlling for socio-demographic characteristics, personality traits, job characteristics, and job satisfaction. Career-oriented individuals exhibit significantly higher quit intentions and search activity, particularly when perceived promotion opportunities are limited. Calling-oriented individuals report substantially lower quit intentions and on-the-job search. By contrast, having a job orientation is not systematically associated with turnover-related outcomes. The associations between work orientations and actual job quits one and two years later are weaker, suggesting that work orientations primarily shape turnover intentions and preparatory search behavior, while actual working conditions more strongly influence mobility. Overall, our findings identify work orientations as a novel and quantitatively important determinant of turnover-related behavior and highlight the role of workers' underlying motivations in shaping mobility beyond standard economic predictors. Supplementary Information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00148-026-01176-w.

Indexed as

Job searchQuit intentionsTurnoverWork orientations

Identifiers

PMID42261323
PMCPMC13242402

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.