ArticleDigital health
Heart rate circadian phase and hyperarousal as wearable digital phenotyping of insomnia: An interpretable machine learning study.
Article in Digital health. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Bipolarity as an Independent Correlate of Clinical Profiles in Insomnia: A Factorial Analysis Across Multiple Clinical Domains.Brain and behavior · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: This study evaluates ML approaches for insomnia classification using physiological and behavioral data from wearable devices. SHAP analysis identifies key predictors, highlighting the relationship between sleep disturbances and digital phenotypes and emphasizing clinical plausibility as a criterion for model selection. Methods: Three hundred thirty-eight participants (249 with insomnia and 89 controls) aged 19-70 years were instructed to wear Fitbit Inspire 3 devices for 4 weeks to record heart rate, activity, and sleep metrics. Insomnia classification was based on Insomnia Severity Index scores (≥8 insomnia and ≤7 controls). Filter- and wrapper-based feature-selection methods were applied to the 120 extracted features. Multiple ML algorithms were evaluated using five-fold cross-validation, with the clinical plausibility of the feature relationships explicitly considered in the final model selection. Results: LightGBM model trained on 60 ANOVA-selected features achieved the highest performance (F1 score = 0.868 ± 0.027). The key predictive features identified by SHAP analysis included delayed acrophase of the heart rate cosinor rhythm, higher self-reported stress and maximum heart rates that aligned with sleep-wake physiology. However, several features exhibited patterns that contradicted previously known clinical expectations, highlighting the disconnection between statistical optimization and clinical utility. Conclusion: Machine learning models trained on wearable data can effectively classify insomnia. SHAP analysis suggested that altered activity patterns reflect sleep disturbance, while also highlighting the necessity for further clinical validation. Clinical plausibility must be integrated as a fundamental criterion in model development, to ensure clinically trustworthy ML applications in sleep medicine.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.