Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42261225›Full record

ReviewPsychological medicine2026

Methodological guidance on clinical prediction models in mental health research.

Raquel Costa, Bruno de Sousa, Thomas Kneib, Rui Martins, Andreas Mayr

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Psychological medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Raquel CostaHEI-Lab: Digital Human-Environment Interaction Labs, https://ror.org/05xxfer42Lusófona University, Campo Grande 376, 1749-024 Lisboa, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0003-1614-540X
Bruno de SousaFaculty of Psychology and Education Sciences, CINEICC, https://ror.org/04z8k9a98University of Coimbra, Coimbra, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0001-9918-8100
Thomas KneibChair of Statistics and Campus Institute Data Science, Faculty of Business and Economic Sciences, Georg-August-University of Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-3390-0972
Rui MartinsDepartment of Mathematics, https://ror.org/04z8k9a98University of Coimbra, Coimbra, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0003-1862-7066
Andreas MayrInstitute for Medical Biometry and Statistics, https://ror.org/01rdrb571Marburg University, Marburg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-7106-9732

Funding

European Social Fund 2023.06934.CEECINDFaculdade de Ciências e Tecnologia, Universidade Nova de Lisboa UID/00324/2025; UID/PRR/00324/2025Faculdade de Ciências e Tecnologia, Universidade Nova de Lisboa UID/PPR/05380/2025; UID/PRR2/05380/2025; UID/05380/2025
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Clinical prediction models play a crucial role in advancing personalized care for mental health disorders, providing essential insights for diagnosis, prognosis and intervention planning. This work examines the current methodological approaches used to develop such models, emphasizing their application to mental health problems, including depression. To illustrate these concepts, we used data on prenatal depression from a multinational observational study of 5,372 pregnant women. The goal is to develop an individual prognostic model for depressive symptoms that can be used already at the beginning of pregnancy. Our analysis explores variable selection strategies, validation methodologies and the integration of clinical expertise with data-driven approaches. Particular attention is given to addressing challenges such as population heterogeneity, overfitting and the importance of external validation for generalizability across diverse settings. We distinguish between statistical regression models and machine learning techniques, discussing their respective strengths and limitations in terms of interpretability, predictive accuracy and clinical usability. This work offers practical guidance for researchers and clinicians, focusing on the critical steps for model development and implementation. We highlight best practices to avoid common pitfalls, advocate for interdisciplinary collaboration and address challenges of integrating advanced statistical and machine learning tools into clinical practice. By providing practical guidance and addressing these issues, our aim is to support the development of robust and clinically relevant prediction models.

Indexed as

DepressionPredictive Learning ModelsPregnancy ComplicationsBoosting Machine Learning AlgorithmsFemaleHumansMachine LearningPrediction AlgorithmsPregnancyPrognosisAI-driven decisionclinical prediction modelsdata-driven approachesdepressiondiagnosisexternal validationmachine learningmental healthpersonalized carerpredictive accuracyprognosisprognostic models

Identifiers

PMID42261225
PMCPMC13247792

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.