ArticleNursing & health sciences2026
Beyond "Peer Worker": Centering Experiential Expertise Within Interprofessional Mental Health Teams.
Article in Nursing & health sciences, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Experiential workers, sometimes referred to as "peer support workers" and often simply as "peers," are increasingly integrated into mental health and community care systems. Despite the growing workforce, these roles remain poorly defined, undervalued, and structurally marginalized. This discussion paper critically examines the systemic challenges faced by experiential workers, including role ambiguity, stigma, precarious employment, and exclusion in interprofessional contexts. Drawing on historical and current debates around professionalization, this paper argues that mental health care teams must actively support the legitimacy and sustainability of experiential work through creation of clearer role definitions and inclusive knowledge frameworks, without compromising its community-rooted ethos. This is explored through interrogating the implications of terminology, workplace dynamics, and professionalization. Recommendations are provided for clinical teams, organizations, researchers, and policymakers to foster meaningful integration, support, and recognition of experiential workers. These include co-developing job roles, embedding interprofessional anti-stigma education, reforming exclusionary labor practices, and funding participatory research. Ultimately, this discussion paper calls for sector-wide collaboration to address structural inequities and ensure that experiential expertise is valued as core to mental health care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.