Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42261187›Full record

ArticleSuicide & life-threatening behavior2026

Suicide Risk Among Youth Who Choose "No Response" on Emergency Department Suicide Risk Screenings.

Stephanie D Boyd, Cheryl A King, David Brent, T Charles Casper, Jeffrey A Bridge, Michael Webb, Claire Hatkevich, Tricia Hengehold, Jacqueline Grupp-Phelan, Pediatric Emergency Care Applied Research Network (PECARN)

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Suicide & life-threatening behavior, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Stephanie D BoydDivision of Emergency Medicine, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2433-4147
Cheryl A KingDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.
David BrentDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5756-2157
T Charles CasperDepartment of Pediatrics, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA.
Jeffrey A BridgeDepartment of Pediatrics, Psychiatry and Behavioral Health, Ohio State University College of Medicine, Columbus, Ohio, USA.
Michael WebbDepartment of Pediatrics, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA.
Claire HatkevichDepartment of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
Tricia HengeholdDepartment of Gastroenterology, Ohio State University College of Medicine, Columbus, Ohio, USA.
Jacqueline Grupp-PhelanDepartment of Emergency Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA.
Pediatric Emergency Care Applied Research Network (PECARN)

Funding

Emergency Department Screen for Teens at Risk for Suicide (ED-STARS)U01MH104311 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI BRENT, DAVID A., GRUPP-PHELAN, JACQUELINE M. · 2014 to 2016
$10.6M
HRSA HHSNIMH NIH HHS U01 MH104311
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionWe compare suicidal behavior outcomes for adolescents who select "no response" on Ask Suicide-Screening Questions (ASQ) items in the emergency department (ED) with those of adolescents who screen negative or positive.

methodsThe multisite Emergency Department Screen for Teens at Risk for Suicide (ED-STARS) study prospectively enrolled adolescents at ED visits, randomizing a subset to follow-up of six-month duration. Participants and parents/guardians completed mental health surveys during the ED encounter and (if applicable) at 3- and 6-month. Risk group was assigned based on ED ASQ score (positive, negative, or nonresponse). Primary outcomes were suicidal ideation, suicide attempt, and mental health service use within 6 months.

resultsThere were 6411 participants assigned to an ASQ group; 2296 participated in follow-up. Nonresponse was associated with intermediate risk for suicidal ideation (nonresponse group adjusted odds ratio [OR] 2.14 [95% CI 1.33-3.41]; positive group 4.35 [2.93-6.51]), attempt (nonresponse group adjusted OR 2.82 [0.97-8.41]; positive group 5.35 [2.25-14.33]), and mental health care receipt (nonresponse group unadjusted OR 3.42 [1.56-7.59]; positive group 9.88 [5.60-17.79]).

conclusionsYouth choosing nonresponse on suicide screening questions may be at elevated risk for suicidal ideation and behavior; ED clinicians should not default to treating these youth as negative screens.

Indexed as

Emergency Room VisitsSuicidal IdeationSuicideSuicide, AttemptedAdolescentEmergency Service, HospitalFemaleHumansMaleMass ScreeningMental Health ServicesProspective StudiesRisk AssessmentRisk FactorsSurveys and Questionnairesadolescenceemergency departmentrisk assessmentscreeningsuicide attemptsuicide risk

Identifiers

PMID42261187
PMCPMC13251324

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.