ReviewClinical pharmacology and therapeutics2026
Payload-Based Clinical Pharmacology Review of Approved Antibody-Drug Conjugates: Commonalities and Considerations for Streamlined Development.
Review in Clinical pharmacology and therapeutics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs) combine the specificity of an antibody with the potency of a cytotoxic drug. Thirteen ADCs, utilizing seven unique cytotoxic payloads and targeting 11 distinct antigens, are currently approved by the US Food and Drug Administration as of June 2025, representing a rapidly growing and highly promising class of anticancer therapeutics. Monomethyl auristatin E is the most frequently used payload (in five approved ADCs), followed by deruxtecan and calicheamicin. It is noted that ADCs using the same linker and payload often share similar PK and catabolism/metabolism characteristics, and thus providing opportunities for their streamlined development provided the applicant owns or has a right of reference of underlying data when it is necessary. In this review, we summarize the key clinical pharmacology considerations by payload class, using approved ADCs as case examples to support development and regulatory approval. We then compare the data and discuss how to leverage prior experience of ADCs, either qualitatively or quantitatively. These data and strategy insights will help researchers to integrate data from platform ADCs that share the same linker-payload and apply broader ADC-related insights, thereby accelerating future ADC developments.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.