ReviewDigestive endoscopy : official journal of the Japan Gastroenterological Endoscopy Society2026
How to Define the Gastroesophageal Junction.
Review in Digestive endoscopy : official journal of the Japan Gastroenterological Endoscopy Society, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- A Ruler Needs a Zero Point: Defining the Gastroesophageal Junction for Length-Based Risk Stratification in Barrett's Esophagus.Digestive endoscopy : official journal of the Japan Gastroenterological Endoscopy Society · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Adenocarcinomas at the gastroesophageal junction (GEJ) are increasingly common worldwide. Current classifications, such as Siewert type II and Nishi, provide a foundation, but establishing a transparent and widely accepted framework could considerably enhance identification and treatment efforts. The recent definition proposed at the Kyoto international consensus conference defines the GEJ zone as the area 1 cm above and below the distal end of the palisade vessels, marking an important step forward. Research has shown that cardiac mucosa can be present from the fetal stage, with its extent often increasing due to conditions like gastroesophageal reflux and age. This phenomenon occurs as an adaptation to the microenvironment in response to, for example, reflux stimuli, and the stem cells responsible for cardiac-type mucosa are likely located in the gastric epithelium. However, intestinal metaplasia frequently arises from the stem cells located in the basal layer of squamous epithelium. CDX2 expression plays a significant role in the development of intestinal metaplasia. In the current classification of GEJ cancers, GEJ adenocarcinoma may represent a mix of what should be classified as esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC) and non-GEJ gastric cancer. The Kyoto international consensus facilitates improved differentiation among EAC, GEJ cancer, and gastric adenocarcinoma. Furthermore, we will briefly discuss endoscopic treatment, chemotherapy, and surgical treatment for GEJ cancer. Looking ahead, the reclassification of GEJ cancers using the Kyoto international consensus, coupled with comprehensive molecular analyses of tumors, promises to yield valuable insights.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.