Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42260979›Full record

ReviewDigestive endoscopy : official journal of the Japan Gastroenterological Endoscopy Society2026

How to Define the Gastroesophageal Junction.

Ken-Ichi Mukaisho, Sachiko Kaida, Takahisa Nakayama, Masaji Tani, Michael Vieth, Takanori Hattori, Ryoji Kushima

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Digestive endoscopy : official journal of the Japan Gastroenterological Endoscopy Society, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. A Ruler Needs a Zero Point: Defining the Gastroesophageal Junction for Length-Based Risk Stratification in Barrett's Esophagus.Digestive endoscopy : official journal of the Japan Gastroenterological Endoscopy Society · 2026
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Ken-Ichi MukaishoEducation Center for Medicine and Nursing, Shiga University of Medical Science, Otsu, Japan.
Sachiko KaidaDepartment of Gastrointestinal and General Surgery, Shiga University of Medical Science, Otsu, Japan.
Takahisa NakayamaDivision of Human Pathology, Department of Pathology, Shiga University of Medical Science, Otsu, Japan.
Masaji TaniDepartment of Gastrointestinal and General Surgery, Shiga University of Medical Science, Otsu, Japan.
Michael ViethInstitute of Pathology, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Klinikum Bayreuth, Bayreuth, Germany.
Takanori HattoriDivision of Human Pathology, Department of Pathology, Shiga University of Medical Science, Otsu, Japan.
Ryoji KushimaDivision of Human Pathology, Department of Pathology, Shiga University of Medical Science, Otsu, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Adenocarcinomas at the gastroesophageal junction (GEJ) are increasingly common worldwide. Current classifications, such as Siewert type II and Nishi, provide a foundation, but establishing a transparent and widely accepted framework could considerably enhance identification and treatment efforts. The recent definition proposed at the Kyoto international consensus conference defines the GEJ zone as the area 1 cm above and below the distal end of the palisade vessels, marking an important step forward. Research has shown that cardiac mucosa can be present from the fetal stage, with its extent often increasing due to conditions like gastroesophageal reflux and age. This phenomenon occurs as an adaptation to the microenvironment in response to, for example, reflux stimuli, and the stem cells responsible for cardiac-type mucosa are likely located in the gastric epithelium. However, intestinal metaplasia frequently arises from the stem cells located in the basal layer of squamous epithelium. CDX2 expression plays a significant role in the development of intestinal metaplasia. In the current classification of GEJ cancers, GEJ adenocarcinoma may represent a mix of what should be classified as esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC) and non-GEJ gastric cancer. The Kyoto international consensus facilitates improved differentiation among EAC, GEJ cancer, and gastric adenocarcinoma. Furthermore, we will briefly discuss endoscopic treatment, chemotherapy, and surgical treatment for GEJ cancer. Looking ahead, the reclassification of GEJ cancers using the Kyoto international consensus, coupled with comprehensive molecular analyses of tumors, promises to yield valuable insights.

Indexed as

AdenocarcinomaEsophageal NeoplasmsEsophagogastric JunctionStomach NeoplasmsHumansBarrett's epitheliumcardiac‐type mucosadistal end of the palisade vesselsgastroesophageal junction

Identifiers

PMID42260979
PMCPMC13247354

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.