ArticleJournal of anatomy2026
A description of dental microanatomy and implantation geometry in Chamaeleonidae.
Article in Journal of anatomy, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Chamaeleonidae is a clade of squamates distributed today across Africa and Madagascar. They exhibit an acrodont dentition wherein each tooth attaches to the apex of the jaw and is sutured directly to the supporting jawbone. Mediolateral contact between the tooth and the supporting jawbone is absent in conventional descriptions, which distinguishes acrodont dentitions from the pleurodont and thecodont tooth implantations seen in other reptiles. While squamates present a diverse array of tooth implantation forms, chamaeleonids uniquely display the development and retention of solely acrodont implantation throughout ontogeny. According to the historical understanding of dental tissue homology, acrodont chamaeleons are assumed to lack the complete set of periodontal tissues described in mammals, crocodilians, pleurodont iguanids, and agamids, among other amniotes. Here, chamaeleonid tooth implantation and attachment tissues are interpreted using thin-section histology and microcomputed tomography. In this study, we identify a previously unrecognized insertion of the labial side of each tooth within the supporting jawbone, in a manner that nevertheless coincides with the apical implantation of each tooth along the labial and lingual aspects of the supporting jawbone. This mediolateral contact, apparent through the appearance of dentine internal to the supporting bone in the transverse view, was previously assumed to be absent by definition in acrodonts. We interpreted Sharpey's fibres in the mineralized attachment tissue as the presence of calcified periodontal ligament, also previously undescribed in chamaeleons. Moreover, a unique interdigitation of dentine and alveolar bone is recognized in the form of a plicidentine-like condition of fluted projections of dentine through which growing jawbone interceded. Based on the results of our study, we define acrodont geometry as the implantation of the tooth onto the apex of the jaw, without the elevation of the labial and lingual pedicles as walls on either side of the tooth, though each side of the tooth may superficially insert within the jaw. Altogether, this work contributes to the trend in recent literature on amniote tooth anatomy towards describing a mammal-like tripartite periodontium in squamates, as opposed to the traditional interpretation of a single 'bone of attachment'.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.