ArticleThe American journal of case reports2026
Transient Hyperattenuating Oral Pseudolesion Mimicking Sialolithiasis Incidentally Detected on Chest Computed Tomography.
Article in The American journal of case reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BACKGROUND Edible intraoral foreign bodies (IOFBs) such as hard candies and chewing gum are an important diagnostic pitfall on computed tomography (CT) because their attenuation often overlaps that of calcified pathology, including sialoliths. Reliance on density alone can prompt unnecessary imaging and patient anxiety. Recognition of typical locations, assessment of ductal anatomy and secondary signs, and short-interval reversibility after oral cavity clearance are key to avoiding misdiagnosis. CASE REPORT A previously healthy 35-year-old woman presented with a 3-day history of throat discomfort and dry cough. Non-contrast chest CT performed for cough evaluation incidentally depicted a well-circumscribed hyperattenuating focus adjacent to the right sublingual gland at the superior edge of the field of view (maximum diameter ~10 mm; mean attenuation ~400 Hounsfield units). Because the acquisition only partially covered the neck, ductal continuity with Wharton's duct, ductal dilation, and perilesional inflammation could not be assessed with confidence. The initial differential diagnosis included a distal Wharton's duct sialolith. Immediate intraoral examination revealed no visible abnormalities or sialolith. Seven days later, a dedicated non-contrast neck CT obtained under identical parameters demonstrated complete resolution of the hyperattenuating focus after explicit instruction to remove all intraoral items. On further questioning, the patient recalled having a cough lozenge in her mouth during the initial scan. Her symptoms resolved spontaneously, and no salivary-gland-related concerns were reported thereafter. CONCLUSIONS Routine pre-scan oral cavity clearance, structured evaluation of ductal continuity/dilation with clinical correlation, and limited repeat scanning when uncertainty persists are pragmatic safeguards that help prevent misdiagnosis and avoid unnecessary testing.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.