Trial reportMedical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research2026
Impact of Gross Motor Coordination Exercises on Perceptual Processes and Praxis in Early School Children With Symptoms of Developmental Coordination Disorder: Preliminary Report of Randomized Controlled Study.
Trial report in Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Impact of Gross Motor Coordination Exercises on Perceptual Processes and Praxis in Early School Children With Symptoms of Developmental Coordination Disorder: Preliminary Report of Randomized Controlled Study.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2026Trial
- The effects of gross motor exercises on perception and praxis in children with motor coordination difficulties-randomized controlled study.Frontiers in neurology · 2026Trial
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BACKGROUND Physical activity has a general impact on cognitive processes, but evidence on the effects of specific exercises on particular cognitive or executive functions remains limited. Previous studies suggest that movements crossing the body's midline stimulate excitability and plasticity in the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex and superior parietal cortex. This study aimed to investigate whether such exercises produce long-term functional changes in these areas. MATERIAL AND METHODS The study involved 22 children aged 6 to 8 years with symptoms of developmental coordination disorder (DCD), divided into 2 equal groups. Both groups completed approximately 9 weeks of coordination training based on Bilateral Integration by Sheila Dobie OBE (the total diagnostic and therapeutic cycle lasted approximately 16 weeks, including a break). The intervention group performed exercises involving midline crossing, while the control group performed exercises without this element. Assessments (sensory integration and praxis tests and the bilateral motor coordination test) were conducted 3 times: before intervention, after 9-week program, and at follow-up. RESULTS Significant improvements were observed in both groups in sequencing praxis (P=0.041 in the control group; P<0.001 in the intervention group) and bilateral motor coordination (P=0.013; P=0.020), but at different rates. In the intervention group, improvements appeared after the intervention, while in the control group only at follow-up. Large effect sizes were found (η² ϵ [0.293, 0.670]), with high statistical power. No significant changes were observed in other functions. CONCLUSIONS The Bilateral Integration method improves sequencing praxis and interhemispheric integration in children with DCD symptoms. Midline-crossing exercises may yield relatively fast improvements in short-term programs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.